In a stunning display of judicial power, Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has decreed a halt to all calls made by wives to their husbands with the sole intention of asking, "Where are you?" This ground-breaking decision has left the nation in a mix of uproar and confusion as men and women alike try to navigate this new communication blockade.
Justice Moraes cited numerous complaints from distressed husbands who claimed that the frequent check-ins were "hampering their personal freedom and mental well-being." His ruling apparently aims to protect the sanctity of men's whereabouts, ensuring a mystery that remains unsolved and maybe, just a bit more exciting.
The public response has been nothing short of a melodrama. Rallies erupted outside the Supreme Court building with banners that read, "Bring back the Right to Ring!" and "What next? No more 'Did you eat?' calls?" Women nationwide have voiced their frustration, often humorously, at the inability to perform what many consider a critical part of marriage – knowing exactly where their husbands are at all times.
On the flip side, a small, oddly satisfied group of husbands has come forward supporting the decree. This group, self-titled "The Free Rangers," has expressed relief over the ruling. They are planning a celebratory barbecue, underlining the decree as a newfound 'liberation' from the telephonic surveillance of their significant others.
Legal experts are scratching their heads over the enforceability of such a ruling. How exactly will this ban be monitored and enforced? Will there be a task force dedicated to intercepting 'Where are you?' calls? The logistics alone have already sparked a fresh round of memes and satirical videos circling on social media. Meanwhile, tech companies are rumored to be developing 'Where are you?' auto-blockers destined to become the next big thing in mobile communications.
