Wibble News Create new article

Debate Heats up as People Argue Over Legality of Breathing

In a turn of events that has left the world baffled, a seemingly innocuous bodily function has taken center stage in a debate that has rapidly spread across the globe. Citizens worldwide are becoming increasingly vocal about a controversial topic: whether breathing should be declared illegal.

The Great Breathing Debate

The origins of this astonishing debate can be traced back to an obscure online forum where an anonymous user questioned if breathing was really necessary. The user cited various environmental and health concerns associated with breathing, arguing that outlawing this function would lead to "heightened consciousness," better air quality, and breathing-related medical ailments would be eradicated.

This seemingly preposterous idea has gained an alarming amount of traction, dividing the populace into two diametrically opposed factions: the "Breatharians" and the "Inhalers." Both sides of the debate are fervently adamant in championing their causes.

The Breatharians, who argue for the illegality of breathing, have begun to rally in cities around the world. They sport matching t-shirts emblazoned with "Every Breath you Take is a Crime," and can be seen waving placards promoting a "breath-free" society. Critics of the movement argue that the Breatharians' demands are utterly absurd, but their leaders remain steadfast in their convictions.

Breatharian rally

One of the key spokespersons for the Breatharians, known only as "Oxygen," granted an exclusive interview to The Wibble, stating that their ultimate goal is to "liberate people from their respiratory shackles." When asked how people would survive without breathing, Oxygen cryptically replied, "Through spiritual enlightenment and the power of will, we shall draw nutrients from our surroundings to sustain ourselves."

The Inhalers, on the other hand, defy the notion of banning breathing. They point out the basic biological necessity of respiration for the survival of all organisms on Earth. This faction considers the Breatharians illogical and a danger to society. The Inhalers have also taken to the streets to march in support of their right to inhale and exhale without restrictions.

Inhalers march

Countering the claims of the Breatharians, renowned scientist Dr. P.N. Umonia spoke out: "The proposal to ban breathing is a preposterous notion based on pseudoscience and a fundamental misunderstanding of human physiology. Any attempts to implement a 'breath-free' society would result in catastrophic consequences, culminating in the demise of human civilization as we know it."

Meanwhile, politicians and lawmakers worldwide are being bombarded with petitions from both sides, demanding they either outlaw or safeguard this essential bodily function. Some political figures have even jumped on the bandwagon, seeing the volatile issue as a means to gain public support or attention.

Politician addressing the breathing debate

In response to this escalating phenomenon, several companies have begun capitalizing on the heated debate, creating and marketing novelty items to cater to both factions. Among the items being sold are breathing masks that claim to "neutralize the effects of illegal breathing," and "pro-breathing" scented candles that promise to "enhance your respiratory experience."

Market stall selling debate-related novelty items

Despite the ludicrous nature of the discussion, the breathing debate has highlighted and exposed rifts within society where skepticism, propaganda, and bizarre conspiracy theories readily take root. As people continue to rally and petition for their respective sides, the world watches with bated breath (or lack thereof) to see where this peculiar debate will lead.

Will the Breatharians succeed in outlawing the simple act of breathing, or will the Inhalers prevail in protecting our inalienable right to respire? Only time will tell. Until then, one thing is clear: the global conversation surrounding the legality of breathing shows no signs of expiring.